Gay Affirmative Psychotherapy in real-time (a primary Interview) Theoretical Orientation and Guiding Principles
A great deal of this harm done on the years to LGBT people was justified by misinterpreting the findings of research to pathologize homosexuality or marketing outcomes of studies with problematic methodologies, for instance the Spitzer (2003) study described earlier in the day. Also when conceding that homosexuality isn’t a disease, some scientists have cherry chosen information to bolster the superiority of heterosexuality or even to argue the appropriateness of modification therapies for the people homosexual people who need to alter regardless of the impact of stigma (Glassgold, Fitzgerald, & Haldeman, 2002; Yarhouse & Throckmorton, 2002).
Such roles and techniques expose the extent to which human being sex has been comprehended solely via a heterosexual paradigm of sex. The emergence of homosexuality, bisexuality , and transgender sex from their closets has threatened the hegemony of heterosexuality. The effect happens to be to mobilize opposition against acceptance of homosexuality as normal and healthier, and also to reinforce the domination and authority of heterosexuality once the only lawfully appropriate type of relationships. In comparison, the style of sex suggested in gay affirmative psychotherapy doesn’t denigrate heterosexuality, but assumes that sexuality is much more variable and fluid than exclusive heterosexuality permits. While intimate orientation (whether a person is homosexual, right, bisexual, or transgender) could be reasonably fixed, sexual identification (whether one calls yourself homosexual, right, bisexual, transgender, or perhaps not) and intimate behavior tend to be more adjustable. Continue reading „A great deal of this damage done on the years to LGBT individuals was justified by…“